Constant Xtra files Freedom of Information request after TTC brings advertisements for homosexual hookup site

Complaints from 16 commuters objecting to an image of shirtless homosexual males adopting prompted the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) to pull advertisements when it comes to gay hookup website Squirt from the subway vehicles in September.

Regular Xtra received copies regarding the complaints after filing a Freedom of Information demand underneath the Municipal Information Act in October 2015.

Squirt.org is owned by Pink Triangle Press, that also publishes day-to-day Xtra.

The TTC eliminated the advertisements on Sept 9, 2015, since they promoted having intimate relations in public, spokesperson Danny Nicholson stated at that time.

On Nov 9 the TTC circulated 18 documents to everyday Xtra, including 15 complaints from transportation users whom objected to your advertisements. It circulated one issue from the TTC worker, whom wondered perhaps the TTC must have an advertisement “for a website that is premised in guys that are helping up in date me login public areas.”

Based on TTC documents, Laurence Lui emailed TTC representative Brad Ross after their early early morning drive on Sept 9 — the exact same day the TTC made a decision to pull Squirt’s ads.

“Not yes the TTC needs to have an advertisement for a niche site this is certainly premised in helping guys connect in public areas (including in the TTC) on our trains,” writes Lui, who’s recognized as a TTC worker into the exact same document.

Ross asks Lui in the event that advertising implies setting up in the TTC. Lui reacts: “No, however the premise of this site is starting up in general public places such as for example washrooms, areas, etc — subway section washrooms are on the website.”

“I would personallyn’t suggest visiting the web site in the office,” Lui adds.

Day-to-day Xtra ended up being not able to achieve Lui for remark by publishing time.

“The TTC received a quantity of inquiries concerning the advertisement from the— that is public solitary e-mail or telephone call prompted action,” Nicholson told everyday Xtra on Nov 23.

“The choice to get rid of the advertisement ended up being made after an employee report on the advertiser’s web site, which advocated functions considered to be unlawful, that will be contrary to your TTC’s marketing policy,” Nicholson says.

For the 18 complaints, two objected not to ever the advertisements but to your TTC’s choice to eliminate them.

One transportation individual saw the adverts and stated they discovered nothing incorrect they found very offensive with them— in contrast to the ads from the Trinitarian Bible Society, which:

“to get rid of the advertisement for the dating that is gay since it offends someone’s delicate sensibilities but to go out of the spiritual marketing programs upon which part of this dilemmas, whether accurately or perhaps not, the TTC appears.”

One transportation individual whom saw the Squirt advertising in the train thought it “very offensive and crazy” and derided the TTC’s initial choice to operate it being a “tasteless and inconsiderate move:”

” The look of the poster ended up being extremely improper along with me personally convinced that TTC ended up being marketing a porn web site. Outraged we checked the web site and saw it’s a horny hookups website! that I wasn’t far off — in their own words”

The ad that is same when you look at the Wellesley subway place in Toronto’s homosexual town from June to September 2015, without problem. Nicholson states the TTC only began getting complaints whenever it relocated the advertisement to the trains.

“It is bad sufficient that you have got a huge poster up at Wellsley sic Station but we positively need not notice it into the subway car.”

— CSC-24767-Y0H9V4

Three complainants identified by themselves as gay guys who objected to Squirt’s depiction of homosexual men as intimately promiscuous:

“we have always been a man that is gay no prude . . . it is it required to expose small children to almost nude males advertising Cruising that is“Non-Stop a web site called for male ejaculation (squirt.org)??”

— CSC-24976-M0Y8R5

Almost every page indicated concern for the young kiddies that would start to see the adverts:

“It had been uncomfortable viewing the advertising additionally the suggestion that is overt “hook up.” We don’t have actually any presssing problems with th sic advertisement into the Wellesley place, but simply felt that people must be mindful for the children whom ride our trains.”

This correspondent ended up being that is“very happy read associated with advertisement campaign’s demise in Metro:

“there isn’t sic need to have these male intercourse objects marketed to our kiddies who will be using the subway on a regular basis. Please hold your ground and never be fazed by these social those who are attempting to market intercourse and their sexism through every and any means!”