For a number of reasons, direct comparisons are certainly not feasible provided the variations in study methodologies, range of diagnostic instruments utilized, and methods to classifying participants into lesbian, gay, bisexual, and categories that are heterosexual. But findings through the Gilman and colleagues to our work (Gilman et al., 2001), the closest methodological match to your NLAAS research design, are illustrative. Gilman et al. used information obtainable in the nationwide Comorbidity Survey (NCS), a population that is general study which used the same research methodology given that NLAAS including utilization of a CIDI based interview. Nevertheless, within the NCS diagnoses had been predicated on DSM IIIR requirements (United states Psychiatric Association, 1987), unlike the DSM IV criteria utilized in the NLAAS. Further, into the Gilman et al. research, the strategy of intimate orientation category and contrast differed: 12 months prevalence of disorders and committing committing committing suicide signs had been compared between people reporting any exact same sex intimate lovers within the 5 years prior to interview and people whom reported just contrary mature solo sex intimate lovers. This efficiently limited the test to individuals have been recently intimately active.
However, contrast of the Gilman et al to our results. findings shows that some problems among Latino and Asian American intimate orientation minorities within the NLAAS may actually take place at demonstrably lower prevalence. A rate far in excess of what was observed in the NLAAS sample (2%, 95% CI: 0.7% 6.3%) in the NCS study, for example, Gilman and colleagues reported that approximately 20% of sexual orientation minorities met criteria for a recent (past year) history of a substance use disorder. Further, within the NCS a lot more than a 3rd of lesbian and women that are bisexually classified35.1%, SE = 7.9%) evidenced a recently available depressive condition. It was a lot more than twice the rate noticed in the study that is current14.7%, SE = 3.9%). In a notably less comparison that is parallel 40% (SE = 7.6%) of lesbian and bisexually classified ladies in the NCS came across requirements for one or more of 6 anxiety problems calculated, however in the NLAAS just 11% (SE = 3.2%) of lesbian and bisexually categorized women came across requirements for almost any associated with 5 anxiety problems evaluated. Most of the real difference right right here, but, may lie when you look at the proven fact that the NCS and NLAAS measured anxiety that is identical with one exception: the NCS also evaluated prevalence of simple phobias, and also this had been highly related to intimate orientation among ladies. Nonetheless, the pattern of significantly reduced prevalence of depressive, anxiety and substance use problems seen among Latino and Asian American lesbians, homosexual males, and bisexual people interviewed in the NLAAS when compared with orientation that is sexual interviewed within the NCS mirrors the reduced prevalence of psychiatric and substance use disorders noticed in studies of Latino and Asian American populations as a whole compared to non Hispanic Whites (Alegria et al., under review; Alegria et al., 2006; Bromberger et al., 2004; Grant et al., 2004; Hasin et al., 2005; Ortega et al., 2000)
طراحی و پشتیبانی شرکت نرم افزارگستر نوآیین